Attention re-structuralists, strategists and people about to be sold a multi-million pound reorganization solution that will solve all those nasty problems of collaboration, customer-centrism and agility, all in one, and in one bill.
Every new structure or system designed to solve a problem brings along new and different problems which in themselves may constitute a bigger problem than the one it was intended to address in the first place.
Any structural solution (translation: new group, division, team, business unit, re-structuring, re-shuffling, re-organization) created to fit a particular problem (and perhaps sold as a perfect solution that just seems to be exactly what is needed) needs to be implemented with at least the provision to deal with unexpected consequences and paradoxical outcomes. Some will be emergent, many could be predicted.
The designing of solutions needs to address the potential liabilities of the new design. No system, including organization architecture, will be neutral. In fact, as it’s said in the ‘systems approach culture’, the system always kicks back.
Even more, there is an application of The Chatelier Principle: any process sets up conditions opposing the further operation of the process.
The solution, always kicks back.
For more on organizational design from Leandro and his team of Organization Architects – watch our webinar on:
The new Promised Land of the so-called ‘future of work’
We know that the new organization has to be very adaptable and flexible, beyond what it has been in the past, but what are the organizational principles that can lead to that? Is there a singular best model? Or, more importantly, can several possibly competing models coexist in one single organization? And, if so, what kind of management and leadership are to be reinvented?
This webinar has now taken place. Please click on the link below to visit our On Demand page.
Would you like to comment?