Leadership can be taught, of course, but not in the same way as teaching how to drive a car or how to cook a risotto.
I’d like the term leadership scaffolding. It means you provide the tools and the models to practice leadership, and to get better at it, with some kind of support system and safety net.
People can’t do it for you. Leadership is a practice. Leadership development is not more and not less than leadership scaffolding.
The teaching, the reading, the looking at role models, the overgrown and overdone 360, the assessment, the simulation exercises, the associated team building and the motivational speaking, all are part of that scaffolding. But only you are up in the building site moving around.
Leadership scaffolding is hard because it is not universal. It needs to be tailored to the individual, or the group in the case of collective leadership. When it comes to leadership, some people react well to sports analogies, other people hate them. Some will absorb inspirational reading, others will dismiss that. Some will need and welcome specific toolkits and how-to, others would dislike off-the-shelf, pret-a-porter models. And yet, all these pieces have a role.
My personal position is that leadership (development, enhancement, scaffolding) needs to be tailored from scratch all the time. In recent months, I have crafted a full plan for one of my best clients. I found myself scrutinizing all I knew about the client and their medium term needs to drive the next level of possibilities. I also found myself discarding lots of very reasonable themes in favour of what would be unique for the client. When I finished my rounds of research, reflection and thinking, I had built a plan which, on paper, only that client could understand.
There was something pure about the non-transferability of the plan. The scaffolding was, after all, tailored to their unique building. Out of that context, it meant nothing. By the way, I did enjoy it enormously, but also it was significantly more tiring than I thought, although it looked rather unpretentious when put on paper.
I suppose you could say the same about coaching. Coaching is a form of human scaffolding as well. Incidentally, something I don’t do, despite everybody assuming the contrary given my psychiatric background.
Funnily enough, our motto is ‘building remarkable organizations’ and, at The Chalfont project, we call ourselves organization architects. Maybe this scaffolding model comes from our roots and sits comfortably here.
I suggest next time you think of your team development, you consider ‘scaffolding it’. It may be that this frame in itself could trigger lots of new ideas
Would you like to comment?