Print This Post Print This Post

This is the last one in the series  of 10 Organizational Pathologies, and the longest write up. Sorry! Bear with me.

Please challenge me on this assumption if you wish, but at least  follow my argument.

Managers and leaders say that they empower people when they give them permission (with the associated accountability) to do things that are not in their job description, that they are not supposed to do. If these things were in their job descriptions, we would not call that empowerment, it would be simply pointing to people things that they should do because it is their duty. Managers then would be simply managing, not empowering. Can we agree?

So empowering others is transferring to them three things: new responsibilities, risks, and maybe (maybe) rewards in success. That people could be penalized for failing in things that they are not supposed to do but are given to them (empowered to do), is a conversation that we tend to avoid.

For empowerment is always broadcast as a good thing. Talking risks would contaminate it too much. And if you did, you would bring along all sorts of health warnings. As a client senior manager told me a while ago, he wanted his people to ‘take risks but be prudent’, a kind of safe sex for management.

What I find fascinating is that if risk is transferred to the empowered, that risk must come from somewhere. It must have had a different home, usually the one of the manager who is empowering. It’s… risk transfer.

The great mind, controversial trader/philosopher/writer, Nassim Taleb, who has that ability to annoy most intellectuals, academics, and people who have no ‘skin in the game’, defines the latter as having a share of the consequences of your own behaviours. For example, he would say, an adviser that advises but is shielded from any possible negative consequences of his advice, has no skin in the game. And this is the title of his latest book. Taleb’s thinking behind this is ‘the asymmetries’, or lack of them, of those consequences in life. He puts those advisers, people who dictate the invasion of countries (‘interventionists’)  and bankers who produced vast misery attributed to ‘unexpected market events’, all of them not bearing any personal consequence, in the same basket: no skin in the game.

In Taleb’s terms (this is my interpretation) a manager who empowers others (in my terms above), who passes risks on, but has no potential share in the consequences of failure; who will not be impacted, or at least not significantly (or as much as the empowered fellow), has no skin in the game. It’s asymmetrical unfairness.

Since empowerment is greatly and naively glorified as a solution for all organizational ills, the manager who empowers always wins (as good manager, good role model, good delegator). If things go wrong,  the magic organizational deity called ‘they’ comes down to earth: they failed, they took too much risk (of yours?), they did not understand, they did not take the right empowerment, they…

Pseudo-empowerment of the type ‘passing the monkey-package of responsibility  plus risks’ (with no Talebian skin in the game) has a sister called Attribution Bias. It goes like this. If they fail, it was their fault (lack of skills, mistakes, blunders). If I succeed, it’s my ability and merit to empower. If they succeed, they are lucky. If I fail it would be all the accumulation of negative circumstances in which I was forced to manoeuvre. Like the bankers in a market crash.

For me, real empowerment (not the pseudo passing the monkey type of having more responsibilities, taking all risks, by the way being prudent, and not forgetting to be joyful with the opportunity) must be symmetrical between the empowering and the empowered. The empowering person must have his share of potential negative impact if things fail in the empowered territory; also positive rewards.

You could say that a manager that empowers others has skin in the game in terms of reputation, for example. Again that is first a hypothesis in search of validation. Organizational life, as I mentioned above, is fairly comfortable with glorifying those who empower and then forgiving them if the empowered troupes screw up. And this is because, in politically correct management land, we always want more empowerment, because empowerment ‘is good’, period.  And Attribution Bias is always at the gates for a rescue.

However, to elevate the confusion to a higher level, as an old friend used to say, in many places ‘empowering people’ is synonymous with ‘for goodness sake do the damned job’ (as I say, often a job that you were supposed to do anyway, but that is not seen as performing). In truth,  the whole territory of empowerment is muddy waters, or perhaps Bermuda Triangle. It has become meaningless.

And for me, restoring meaning entails ‘symmetrical skin in the game’ a la Taleb. At least, we should consider it as working definition. It would be good for clarity, transparency and efficiency; and will decrease the traffic of monkeys in the organizational jungle. #leavethemonkeysalone.

Keep up with the Daily Thoughts

Twitter Email

Would you like to comment?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To search my website, please use the form below.

  Daily Thoughts

September 27th, 2023

Redefining Talent Wealth

The war on talent McKinsey consultants started it with a book of the same title. By focusing on what it […]

September 8th, 2023

What I Learnt From The Monks: A Little Anthropology Of Leadership And Space On One Page

My friends, monks of a Benedictine monastery in the Highlands, Scotland, spend most of the time in silence. I mean, […]

August 23rd, 2023

Can We Rescue DEI From Its Trap (The Label)?

Most of the problems and challenges in organizations, together with most of the solutions, are behavioural in nature. It’s about […]

August 10th, 2023

Restructuring to force collaboration, is likely to create more anxiety than collaboration. Structural solutions for behavioural problems hardly work.

Sometimes restructuring is done with the intention of solving a collaboration problem. ´A people´ don’t talk to ´B people´; if […]

July 18th, 2023

The ‘Impossible To Disagree With’ School Of Management

‘Good leaders have empathy, respect employees and set the example. If you want to change things, you need to have […]

June 29th, 2023

Large scale change is not small scale change repeated many times. Small wins repeated are lots of small wins.

Large scale change, as a series of cascading small scale interventions (often under the philosophy of ‘small wins’) has dominated […]

June 6th, 2023

Culture change is not long and difficult. But we make it so…

I suppose the question is how long is long and how difficult is difficult? In general, business and organizational consulting have […]

May 19th, 2023

Value is an overused term in business and, as such, it’s becoming meaningless

Value, as usually used, means transactional monetary value. Usually it doesn’t mean intrinsic value, or value per se. For example, […]

May 4th, 2023

The importance of ‘critical thinking.’ Your own critical thinking is more effective at making your workplace better than any generic employee survey.

Build your own Employee Engagement argument for free. You can’t go wrong. Here are three baskets full of concepts: Basket […]

April 21st, 2023

´Busy-Ness’ Is A Trap

I went to a big conference where I was introduced by the chairman like this: “Welcome everybody. Lovely to have […]

April 14th, 2023

Training and culture change. The love affair that ends in tears.

It seems to be very hard for people to get away from the idea that if we just put individuals […]

April 11th, 2023

Teamocracies and Networkracies have different citizens: in-Habitants in team-work, riders in net-work

The old view of the organization is something close to the old concept of a medieval city, where citizenship was […]

April 5th, 2023

3 Ways To Get Approval From Your CEO Or Your Leadership Team

Way number 1: My team has developed these three options, A, B and C. Which one do you want us […]

March 29th, 2023

A Cheat Sheet To Create A Social Movement Tip = to shape organizational culture since both are the same.

Mobilizing people. This is another of the Holy Grails (how many have I said we have?) in management. Whether you […]

March 16th, 2023

Critical Thinking Self-Test: A 10 Point Health Check For Your Organization And Yourself. If any of these are a good picture of your organization, you need to put ‘critical thinking’ in the water supply.

Test yourself, and your organization. Do any of these apply? Doing lots, too fast without thinking. High adrenaline, not sure […]

March 9th, 2023

A culture of safety or a culture of training in safety?

Cultures are created by behaviours becoming the norm. Safety is at the core of many industries. Significant budgets are allocated […]

March 2nd, 2023

Empowerment is an output. If you can visualize it, you can craft it.

The real question is, what do you want to see happening so that you can say ‘people are empowered’? Employee […]

February 24th, 2023

A simple question will jumpstart your organization into change. It will also save you from months of pain spent reorganizing your people and teams.

The following line will short-cut months of (building) ‘alignment’, integration, reorganization, team building, coalition building, and any situation in which Peter, […]

February 20th, 2023

Lead Via Peer-To-Peer Networks – If you don’t lead via peer-to-peer networks, you’re only driving your car in first gear.

Peer-to-peer work, transversal, spontaneous or not, collaboration, peer-to-peer influence, peer-to-peer activities of Viral Change™ champions or activists, all of this is the […]

February 7th, 2023

Write a script, not a strategic plan

If you care about the journey and the place, you need a story. If you have a good, compelling one, […]

January 26th, 2023

3 self-sabotaging mechanisms in organizations

Organizations, like organisms, have embedded mechanisms of survival, of growth and also of self-sabotage. These are 3 self-sabotage systems to […]

January 10th, 2023

Who should be involved in culture change? All inclusive versus going where the energy is.

Many times, in my consulting work, I find myself facing a dilemma: Do I involve many people on the client’s […]

December 23rd, 2022

Tell what won’t change – Introducing 1 of my 40 rules of change

In any change programme that any organization wants to start, they will start by thinking of the things that they […]

December 16th, 2022

Scale It – Introducing 1 of my 40 rules of change

When creating effective change in any organization, there are 40 rules that, in my experience, are the key between success […]

December 5th, 2022

Assets & Strengths Base – Introducing 1 of my 40 rules of change

For more than 30 years I have been involved in ‘change’ in organizations. Again and again, some fundamental principles, and often […]

November 25th, 2022

Campaign It… is 1 of my 40 rules of change

When you filter out the noise, when you try to extract the core, the fundamentals, those ‘universal rules’ of change […]

October 31st, 2022

Hybrid or not hybrid? That’s not the question…

Culture is the new workplace If you want to have a conversation about the future of work, the nature of […]

October 24th, 2022

‘Powered by Viral Change™’: A Social Transformation Platform for the organization of the 21st Century

When we started to work on Viral Change™, as a way to create large scale behavioural and cultural change, and […]

October 14th, 2022

Corporate tribes, intellectual ghettos and open window policies

We talk a lot about silos in organizations usually in the context of Business Units or divisions. But these are not […]

October 7th, 2022

Peer Networks are the strongest force of action inside the organization

Peer-to-peer works, transversal, spontaneous or not, collaboration, peer-to-peer influence, peer-to-peer activities of Viral Change™ champions or activists, all of this is […]